Wal-Mart Backs Employer Mandate

July 1, 2009

I wanted to alert you to a good post by Jonathan Cohn of The New Republic on the news that Wal-Mart is backing an employer mandate for health insurance.  Writes Cohn:

Most reform advocates support the idea, arguing it’s necessary both to raise the money necessary to finance universal coverage in the early years and to protect existing employer coverage for people who already have it. But many conservatives, not to mention many trade groups, detest the idea — calling it an unconscionable burden on business and overreach of government authority.

Starting today, those critics are going to have a harder time making their argument stick. And it’s all thanks to Wal-Mart.

Yes, Wal-Mart — the company famous for finding new and creative ways to squeeze employee health benefits — has today endorsed, in principle, an employer mandate.


There’s Money in Healthcare Fraud

July 1, 2009

The Blue Cross Blue Shield Assn. reported that anti-fraud efforts among its member companies saved nearly $350 million in 2008, an increase of 43% from 2007.  The number of cases opened increased nearly 34%. 

Separately, WellPoint (the nation’s largest owner of BCBS plans) said it saved and/or recovered nearly $75 million in 2008 from anti-fraud efforts.   

How much is lost to healthcare fraud every year?  According to the FBI, an estimated 3% to 10% of all healthcare spending – or up to $240 billion – is lost to healthcare fraud annually. 

In 2007 (the latest data available), the FBI investigated 2493 cases of healthcare fraud resulting in 839 indictments, 635 convictions, $1.12 billion in restitution, $4.4 million in recoveries, $34 million in fines, and 308 seizures valued at $61.2 million.

The National Health Care Anti-Fraud Assn., which released a report last month on the problem of healthcare fraud, points to Florida — especially South Florida — as a hotbed of activity.

One example in Florida stands out – the problem of “phantom” health care providers – providers that do not exist except on paper, but who manage to defraud public and private programs of millions of dollars. A recent project in Florida to validate durable medical equipment (DME) providers demonstrated that nearly one third – 481 – of the 1600 DME providers simply did not exist. These phantom providers across South Florida collected hundreds of millions of dollars from Medicare, Medicaid and other public programs in a matter of years.

The NHCAA study notes that the example of Florida serves to highlight broad weaknesses in the nation’s overall healthcare system around fraud:

  • A lack of effective controls in public and private health care programs, particularly when attempting to identify fraud prior to the payment of a fraudulent claim; 
  •  The enormous losses which can be generated by a small segment of the system (one small geographic region generating hundreds of millions of dollars in fraudulent claims from just a few health care services); 
  •  The impact from fraud affecting both public and private health care programs;
  •  The need for improved information sharing and cooperation between public law enforcement agencies;
  •  The additional – and equally important – need for information sharing between those public agencies and the private health insurance industry. 

Given the need to control future healthcare costs to pay for reform, I’m guessing that efforts to detect healthcare fraud will get even more attention going forward.

Addition (July 1, 2009; 2:43 p.m.): The BCBSA fraud figures include commercial, FEHBP and other business lines, but exclude Medicare and Medicaid.  Separately, industry groups tend to quote the lower end of the FBI’s range of 3% to 10% when estimating fraud as a percentage of healthcare expenditures.


Maybe Instead of Reforming Healthcare, Obama Should Start a Business

July 1, 2009

I’ve been playing around with some state-by-state data on the Kaiser Family Foundation web site trying to figure out if there are any correlations between the uninsured and penetration levels for Medicaid, individual insurance and employer-sponsored insurance.

The first chart (below) shows for each of the 50 states and D.C. the percentage of the state’s population in Medicaid on the x axis and the percentage of people uninsured on the y axis.  It suggests there is no correlation between Medicaid penetration and the level of uninsured.

UninsuredvsMedicaid

The second chart (below) shows the percentage of each state’s population in individual health plans on the x axis and the percentage of people uninsured on the y axis.  It suggests a small indirect correlation between individual insurance penetration and the level of uninsured; i.e., as individual insurance penetration rises, the percentage of uninsured falls (but only a little).

UninsuredvsIndividual

The last chart (below) shows the percentage of the state’s population in employer-sponsored health plans on the x axis and the percentage of people uninsured on the y axis.  It suggests a substantial indirect correlation between ESI penetration and the level of uninsured, i.e., the higher the ESI penetration, the lower the level of uninsured.

UninsuredvsESI

I’d be interested in your thoughts on what this information means.  To me it suggests something obvious: Medicaid and the individual insurance market (as structured today) aren’t adequate to pick up the slack of a faltering employer-sponsored health insurance market.  (Btw, I also ran the charts for correlations between ESI, individual and Medicaid.  Higher ESI penetration did clearly correlate to lower Medicaid levels, but the correlation wasn’t as strong as between ESI and the uninsured; there was no correlation between ESI and individual).

So the question is whether the reforms being proposed — i.e., expanding Medicaid and instituting individual market reforms — will do the trick.  But you knew that already.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.